Malcolm Ocean's roamblog

solutions are way harder than problems

created 2020-03-07 · edited 2020-03-07 · open in Roam
  • status: draft
  • type: tweetstorm
  • date: 2020-03-07
  • Have held off on tweeting this for now since it gets into sensitive stuff.
  • just because someone can blow your mind with their diagnosis of your problem, doesn't mean the solution they offer:
    - will be viable at all
    - will actually solve the problem if implemented
    - will not produce worse problems if implemented
  • this applies to
    - apps
    - politics
    - global policy

    ...everything?
  • Re: apps. Slack said "email is broken." They were right.

    Now *many* apps are pitching you "slack is broken." They're also right.

    But their solutions are still in the same paradigm fundamentally, and fall into similar attractor basins.

    twitter.com/littleidea/status/728103353582903296
  • Re: politics. This one is fun, actually!

    Take a party or movement you disagree with (for me this is almost all of them) and then consider that they somehow managed to successfully diagnose a problem for many people in a way that resonated for those people.
  • Consider that the following perspectives have each indeed identified things that are broken in the world.

    Consider that none of their solutions are adequate.

    - hippies
    - Jordan Peterson
    - feminism (each wave)
    - trad-conservative
    - SJW
    - NRX
    - libertarian
    - postmodern
  • other related threads to pull in here
    • both/and & either/or...
      • "you're either with us or against us"
      • variant: "you're either for our solution or you don't care about our problem" - this is very very common and is the main reason why JP and SJWs are fighting
    • the definition of "evil" in Finite & Infinite Games by James Carse: ~"(almost) all evil occurs through the desire to eliminate evil" >
  • Or there's lots of historical political examples:
    - Marx's theories rallied a revolution that didn't really help the proletariat
    - Hitler *got elected* based on giving a voice to enough German people
    - ...&++

    It's easy to be naively inspired if you're desperate for any solution.
  • Re global policy... externalities are a major factor here. Also just not understanding how complex systems work in the first place.

    twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/status/1201411445751197697
  • stuff to incorporate
      • re solutions are way harder than problems, I started drafting a tweet but it got long & complex:
        • I regularly remind myself that when people or ideologies say "this is messed up":
          - they're almost always right that *something* is borked
          - they usually have at least a little insight into what
          - no matter how clarifying or mindblowing their description of the problem, 99%+ of proposed solutions are complete nonstarters
        • Maybe another, even shorter way to put this is "Not liking someone's solution doesn't mean that there isn't a problem. Most solutions are junk."
        • Although how I *actually* want to frame it is "just because someone can convince you there's a problem, doesn't mean you have to accept their solution"
        • Here we go:
          • Accepting that something is a problem does not require accepting any proposed solutions.

            99% of described problems are real and important, at least in some sense. 99% of proposed solutions are at best irrelevant and at worst actively would exacerbate things.
          • (tweeted this)
  • scratchpad