coherence empathy
No content on this page itself — see linked references below.
14 linked references
What are the components or dimensions required for collaborative culture?
another model from August 23rd, 2022 › perspective-taking › not empathy in an emotionally resonant sense, but seeing …
- though also coherence empathy
May 8th, 2023
- the power of deep listening #blogpost - coherence empathy outside therapeutic contexts
- "living" vs "stuff in" case study (see tiny recording from today)
November 6th, 2022
the liberalism paradox, aka tolerating the intolerant or … › Some initial thoughts on the topic: › a few key points: › one main thing to differentiate is that there's a differe…
- coherence empathy, ie a stance of honoring that people's points of view are what they are and not expecting them to change those without evidence
- AND this in itself is actually a brilliant illustration of what I'm talking about with respect to the relevance of coherence empathy to collaborative culture / meta-protocol
May 17th, 2022
call w Daniel Thorson & Trinley Goldenberg - Emerge podcast › MAPLE › respecting tradition = respecting cultural coherence
October 27th, 2021
- Empathy for how the symptom is necessary to have
- “Mm hm, it just doesn’t feel right to you to take a next step...”
August 1st, 2021
What are the components or dimensions required for collab… › current/new model as of sometime in 2021
- The implications of Unlocking the Emotional Brain go deeper than just overt trauma though. They provide a scaffold for understanding and respecting our bodyminds as sensemaking systems, such that we can stop trying to stuff the ticket back in the machine and get on with learning and integrating all of our different perspectives.
- This applies internally as well as interpersonally.
thinking that rejects other thinking
- The level of culture change I'm interested in though is shifting things on the meta-meme level though, moving from thinking that rejects other thinking to coherence empathy-based thinking.
- The shift out of thinking that rejects other thinking and into being able to learn from everyone comes from internalizing & generalizing coherence empathy—recognizing that everything everyone thinks (and does) somehow actually makes obvious sense from some perspective (which is the perspective from which they thought it or did it). If it doesn't make sense to you, there's something you don't understand.
- Importantly, this applies to your own behavior too—you think things and do things for reasons you are not conscious of, and there's a sense to it even if it seems senseless.
- If you ever find yourself saying about anybody's behavior "that didn't make sense", see if you can find a way for it to make sense to ask "what sense did that make?"
- And if you can't, well, that makes sense.
- In general, someone who looks naive to you knows something you don't.
- You usually know something they don't, of course, as well, which is why they look naive to you.
- But if your relevant knowledge was properly a superset of theirs, it would be straightforward to convey what you know to them, and let's face it—that's rarely the case for anything interesting.
- (I'm not just talking about factual knowledge but embodied or relational knowledge as well, or knowledge of what-it's-like-to or how-it-feels-to or what-happens-when)
- (It's worth noting that while being unable to convey what you know to them is a strong sign that they know something you don't, the mere fact of having had a conversation that appears to result in you conveying something to them does not prove that you actually had such a superset—more common is that the person you're talking to mentally suppresses some of their own knowings that would produce objections that you don't understand and wouldn't be able to respond effectively to. This requires some amount of knowing what they know, but can also occur for many reasons ranging from charisma to social power to frame battle skill.)
June 28th, 2021
oh! I could write up a #blogpost on commitment/choice is … › my friend asked me what I thought of the 15 commitments o… › I came up with an articulation that I'm not totally satis… › let's first acknowledge that you probably have no reason …
- but in relation to ongoing ways-of-operating, committing to repeatedly choosing one action over another is counteractive rather than coherence empathy-based
trust dance moves
Here's one model from August 3rd, 2020, with a bit of edi… › There are a couple of modes people are often in when trus… › People usually aren't consciously in control of which mod… › added November 19th, 2021 in convo with Eric Chisholm - i… › but can honor that they are actually making the most of t…
- relates to coherence empathy & second suffering
levels or kinds of reconciliation
- & getting to them requires some substantial amount of coherence empathy & perspective-taking