Malcolm Ocean's roamblog

Hemispheres Linkpost

created 2020-01-31 · edited 2020-01-31 · open in Roam
  • This page = Connections I've spotted between Iain McGilchrist's hemisphere model and other models, written as if to someone else who has read McGilchrist's book, rather than attempting to explain the model itself. If you want a primer, there's:
  • Okay! Without further ado, what am I most excited about connecting McGilchrist's hemisphere model with?
  • There's an overarching theme to many of the things below that's like "if you want <outward mindset/awakening/complexity/etc> then more importantly than training yourself in those things is training the left hemisphere to get out of the way."
    • In particular, don't seek "the rules" for any of these things, as that's attempting to teach your left hemisphere how to be a right hemisphere, which does not work (speaking as someone who has tried for a few years to do so). That's like seeking the script for an improv show—nobody knows what it is.
  • Inward & Outward Mindset
    • Arbinger Institute has a model of two distinct ways-of-thinking/being/relating, one they call "inward mindset" and the other "outward mindset". From the inward mindset's perspective, other people get treated as obstacles, vehicles, or irrelevant.
    • Well, this is basically how the left hemisphere relates to everything! And that's okay; it's not made to be a relational, social creature. It doesn't track body language, facial expression, tone of voice, empathy, etc.
    • < tweet to rindzin linking it inward/outward mindset & 3 poisons >
  • Buddhism, awakening, enlightenment
    • > "Intellect itself needs to taste the manner in which it functions as a method of obscuring the nature of Mind."
      • —page 3 of Roaring Silence (dzogchen book)
      • this excerpt captures brilliantly the value I got from learning about McGilchrist's model!
    • < connection with spectrum of ecstasy >
    • already awake (dzogchen) = already have a right hemisphere
    • Tilopa's Six Words as instructions for the LH to shhh
  • System 1, System 2 & other confusions
    • < tweets about this >
  • Complexity, withness
    • < cynefin model >
    • The left hemisphere naturally prefers simple & complicated systems, where everything can be known (at least in principle) and where there's a right answer (at least in principle) about what should be done.
    • By contrast, the right hemisphere is naturally suited to working with complex systems.
  • Kegan Stages & developmental models
    • One perspective suggests that subject-object shifts or developmental upgrades (see "Grow Up" in Dimensions of Growth) are essentially something going
      • from being novel & paradoxical & only apprehendable by the right hemisphere
      • to being familiar & understood & conceptualized by the left hemisphere
    • What if the Kegan stages as we know them exist only in the context of everybody being overly fixated on the left hemisphere's perspective?
      • (below paragraphs originally written as a reply in a slack channel)
      • The left hemisphere maintains a worldview that it thinks is consistent and perfect, always. That's its main job: to treat the world as something it understands and can manipulate. Modern Western culture WAY overemphasizes the left-hemisphere's way of thinking. This means that as people develop more sophisticated ways of making sense of the world, whether via rationality or new age stuff, they end up with some sort of system that they interpret everything through and are trying to follow to produce a right answer. If that system is external, you're K3; if its internal, K4. K5 represents transcending that stuckness by accessing the more open-ended right hemisphere perspective and allowing its validity.
      • The above is obviously a gross oversimplification, but there is a thing that feels important and true about it that is missing from the other ways I've thought about the Kegan model. Essentially, this implies that there's still a developmental thing in terms of mastering the left & right hemisphere's unique strengths and coordinating between them, but that the specific arc Kegan identified may be very much a pathology that is shared among all modern Western folk (and maybe a larger group, to a lesser extent) rather than the path of development you'd see in an already-fluid society where people are never taught to get so attached to their concept of right & wrong (which all lives in the LH).
      • ( I have tweeted these paragraphs here )
  • Artificial Intelligence & AI Safety
    • < thread on this >
  • Psychology - "what if everyone had the same pathology, and we didn't notice because it was 'normal'?"
    • Various conditions, from Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) to Depression, are known for a phenomenon called "splitting" which is pretty obvious what it is when called by its other names: black-and-white thinking or all-or-nothing thinking.
      • It's also literally reified as one of the "three laws of thought" which are actually basically laws of logical, left hemisphere thought.
      • The entire left hemisphere mode of thinking is inherently categorical; it takes its categories as given, and everything as either member of a category or not a member of a category. This is fine, when this "either/or" is held within the "both/and" world of the right hemisphere, but when taken as all-there-is makes for rigid thinking in general
    • On page 406 of The Master and his Emissary, McGilchrist cites neuroscience studies that indicate BPD and other conditions are linked to increased left hemisphere activation.
    • The wacky thing about the brain of course is that it's complexly intertwingled hardware & software. Dialectical Behavior Therapy, which does not involve using drugs, can enable BPD patients to go from emotionally unregulated & suicidal to an ongoingly workable way of being. [this can be phrased better]
      • This probably results in increased right hemisphere activation.
  • Cognitive Decoupling
  • Other stuff