collective intelligence
No content on this page itself — see linked references below.
8 linked references
January 1st, 2026
- "the general will is the site of maximum transparency, in this sense, that we are opacity is inherent to particular wills which we often try to realize by indirect strategies using manipulation and false appearances. This touches on another form of representation of a quasi-theatrical type which is also bad and harmful."
October 14th, 2022
- > In many everyday activities, individuals have a common interest in coordinating their actions. Orthodox game theory cannot explain such intuitively obvious forms of coordination as the selection of an outcome that is best for all in a common-interest game. Theories of team reasoning provide a convincing solution by proposing that people are sometimes motivated to maximize the collective payoff of a group and that they adopt a distinctive mode of reasoning from preferences to decisions. This also offers a compelling explanation of cooperation in social dilemmas. A review of team reasoning and related theories suggests how team reasoning could be incorporated into psychological theories of group identification and social value orientation theory to provide a deeper understanding of these phenomena.
Cointelligence R&D Lab Proposal
- We could experiment with measures like Woolley's collective intelligence tests, although they seem like the sort of thing that would have some amount of practice effects.
John Vervaeke
- convos with Jonathan Pageau re collective intelligence
January 21st, 2022
- A Fire Upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge
- huh, in the later Ender books, the pequinhos are also interestingly relevant here
- maybe even a The Master and his Emissary thing going on there, though I'll say no more than that here
January 8th, 2022
- connects with Woolley's collective intelligence research, which identifies that higher CI is experienced in groups where people talk similar amounts of time
