does it grow corn?
No content on this page itself — see linked references below.
1 linked reference
June 20th, 2024
- aka
- = is it real?
- = does it increase life? / does it serve life?
- = does it solve the problem?
- = does it usefully organize negentropy
- definition has to anchor back in the first person
- "what matters" can't be an objective definition
- if you say "solve the problem" then you've baked in relevance
- which has the problems pointed at by 2012 paper Relevance Realization and the Emerging Framework in Cognitive Science
- but I think that's inherent to it; the aim is not to solve that part but to factor it out so it can be multiplied by something else that is clear
- relevance × (... ... ...)
- part of what's great about the growing corn frame is that it's like 0-1 in terms of simulacra levels
- = is it solving a problem that exists without other minds?
- what's really grounding about growing corn is you need to eat
- intelligence as non-lifecycle-based adaptation
- "the meme is not informing you what the problem is"
- it informs on the level of strategies
- analogue to NVC's strategies vs needs
- "what's the real problem when you factor out the solution frame?"
- "your problem is you might go to hell if you don't accept Jesus as lord and savior"
- "every apparent problem/solution has something real to it—that's how it's able to grip you
- but that doesn't mean the frame is telling you anything useful about what the problem is"
- "problems are problems you can tell for yourself before you're given a frame"
- me > what about the problem of calculus not integrating with the rest of math? (for the first 200 years)
- "well, calculus is not saying that calculus needs to be plugged into the rest of math"
- how can I tell if a problem is solved?
- "does it actually work?"
- do I have enough counter-space for the cooking I'm about to do?
- am I saved by Jesus?
- is my apartment a safe place for a toddler?
- self-help has a baselessness
- heideggerian problems? see nosilverv's thread
- long thread by nosilverv, that talks about heidigger's present-at-hand and ready-to-hand and self-improvement requiring self-as-object, and 4chan
- difference between "X" and "my conception/experience of X"
- "the problem is solved" is not framed in terms of my conception of it
- terminal goals, temptation to write-off
- original spin — in spirituality, the "your resistance is a problem"
- you can't tell that it's a problem until they're telling you so
- and then the only way you can tell is they're telling you
- which is giving you a solution to a problem you couldn't tell you had before they gave you a solution
- me > but sometimes it's "the reason you're hurting is your resistance"
- which has a different issue, not this one
- tracking "is it real" that go up a lot higher
- eg the emotional torment of being stuck in naraka
- if there's an intervention that can relieve the torment, that counts as growing corn
- M > what about solving a problem someone doesn't know they have until it's solved?
- but you can tell, after the solution was implemented, that a real problem was solved
- "what is the problem that is being solved, by the solution that is being abstractly described as removing original spin?"
- I mean, shoulding yourself in the foot
- business is solving problems for other people
- = you can't escape learning
- = you can never solve all your problems
- the issue arises when you try to be free of problems, rather than trying to be free of this problem