June 20th, 2022
- convo between Rob Haisfield & Malcolm Ocean
- sources:
- M > here's a demo of my convo notetaking syntax
- R > mhm.
- E > In early 2014, Chris Granger et al raised 2.3M in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz with the mission of democratizing programming.
- > In early 2014, Chris Granger et al raised 2.3M in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz with the mission of democratizing programming.
- M > it would be really cool if
- this
- E > In early 2014, Chris Granger et al raised 2.3M in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz with the mission of democratizing programming.
- were automatically replaced with something like
- > In early 2014, Chris Granger et al raised 2.3M in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz with the mission of democratizing programming.
- R > yeah
- old syntax
- << here's a thing I said
>> here's a thing- R > here's a thing Rob said
- B > woof
- hypothetical convo between Michael Ashcroft & Malcolm Ocean
- sources:
- MA: Michael Ashcroft
- MO: Malcolm Ocean
- MO > yo your vision is dope
- MO > this takes too long to type
- shorthand (scope: convo between Rob Haisfield & Malcolm Ocean)
- R > %ED is one of the most inspiring things I've read
- M > oh cool I haven't read it
- how does %EH compare to Thoughts on conceptual abstraction transitions
- convo between Mortimer Orpheus & Bill Smith
- sources:
- MO: Mortimer
- R > roam doesn't handle sequential lists well
- M > totally, that's a huge issue
- R > yeah, if I wanted that. to be queryable, I'd have to keep indenting all the replies
- which just isn't how conversations work
- (M > I assume he means chat-structure)
- quoting someone quoting someone
- M > R > there's gonna be a "before Jump" and "after Jump"
- M > R > roam doesn't handle sequential lists well
- R > in remnote, it would be like this:
- R >
- utterance
- then you'd just blockref the utterance and it would show up as
- M >
R > [utterance]
- M > you could literally render this block as
- R > like a blockquote but it shows the name along the side of it
- M > I'm not saying this is actually good, but something like it could be
- M > if I'm taking notes on a convo
- then this is still me talking
- and so is this
- and this is too
- but if I'm taking notes on a source material (not in a conversation)
- then currently how I do it is
- well, I don't actually use the
E >syntax - I just use block quotes
- and I just do
- > quote from source
- my commentary on quote
- so that would need to change
- so it would need to be something more like
- E > quote from source
- M > thoughts:
- asdfasdf
- asdf
- asdf
- ...which is kind of annoying
- there are times it'd be nice to do
- E > quote from source
- more quote from source
- more
- (and then it's collapsible etc)
- sometimes I do this
- X >
- > blockquote
- ...but this would still kinda want to be an X utterance
- ...idk how to solve that
- different syntax for external source vs convo-note-source??
- M > lots of design decisions here
- R > could be valuable to just write out loud about what the decisions are