Malcolm Ocean's roamblog

February 25th, 2023

edited 2023-02-25 · open in Roam
  • my threads on twitter, re accountability... sort of relates to whether a company/employee has an ego
  • notes, I forget where from
    • anyway, here are the original LRC commitments and assumptions. I have in some sense been aiming to embody what these are pointing at since I first learned about them 10 years ago. I used to *try* to embody them, and I don't do that anymore.
    • I now have several serious critiques of the articulation here but insofar as these are just a dozen pointers to a single way-of-being shift, that way-of-being still seems to me like the obvious way to live, and I expect that to be basically self-evident to anyone who understands what the shift is. so eg you'll take issue with the "no apologies" thing, but the stuff you like about apologies is totally doable from that other way-of-being, whether it calls itself an apology or not, or whatever (and meanwhile the Upstart scene was bad at doing the thing that good apologies are good for)
    • --
    • The reason I talk about “non-naive” trust-dancing is to point at how while naive trust (or “faith”) can work in the short term, attempts to rebuild it break down unless they shift to that a common failure mode is attempting to build trust using naive trust and that in some sense all trust-dancing is ultimately non-naive in the sense that it will ultimately ground out in whatever is underneath.
  • getting in sync - good short thread
  • non-duality - Neil / Norm quote about the universe being uncaring
  • dogs - tweet that's relevant to trust or trustworthiness is not universal or transitive... because one person might be like "my dog is safe" or whatever but if one of you is like "all dogs are mean to me" and the other is like "my dog isn't mean to anyone" then AT LEAST ONE OF YOU IS OVERGENERALIZING